<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Hanks? TOM HANKS!?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shanelife.com/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shanelife.com/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/</link>
	<description>Shane Adams&#039; personal blog about life, movies, TV, music, spirituality, pop culture, poker, and tasty burritos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Da Vinci Code at I, Shane</title>
		<link>http://shanelife.com/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>The Da Vinci Code at I, Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 11:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topfivedesign.com/shane/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>[...] For a long time, I have spoken out that I thought that Tom Hanks was an awful choice for Robert Langdon. Turns out that I was right all along. However, the movie succeeds IN SPITE of Hanks&#8217; awful, uninspired acting. (I don&#8217;t know if I would even call it &#8220;acting&#8221;&#8230;he didn&#8217;t even seem like he was acting. He just seemed like he was reading his lines as Tom Hanks with ridiculous long hair.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a long time, I have spoken out that I thought that Tom Hanks was an awful choice for Robert Langdon. Turns out that I was right all along. However, the movie succeeds IN SPITE of Hanks&#8217; awful, uninspired acting. (I don&#8217;t know if I would even call it &#8220;acting&#8221;&#8230;he didn&#8217;t even seem like he was acting. He just seemed like he was reading his lines as Tom Hanks with ridiculous long hair.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://shanelife.com/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topfivedesign.com/shane/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Amen on all levels we are thinking alike. Hey Danie here from Alias blog crews I just checked the crew email for the first time in like well forever and just wanted to say that I am processing the request and that you will be added on the next update which is most likely tomorrow. Remember once you are added you will need to put the list on your site. 
-Danie of http://second-star.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen on all levels we are thinking alike. Hey Danie here from Alias blog crews I just checked the crew email for the first time in like well forever and just wanted to say that I am processing the request and that you will be added on the next update which is most likely tomorrow. Remember once you are added you will need to put the list on your site.<br />
-Danie of <a href="http://second-star.org" rel="nofollow">http://second-star.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miranda</title>
		<link>http://shanelife.com/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topfivedesign.com/shane/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally with you.  Tom Hanks, decent enough actor back in the day but he&#039;s totally wrong for that movie.  I like your choices, but I submit Alan Rickman as Langdon.  Assuming he could pull of the American accent I think he&#039;d be badass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally with you.  Tom Hanks, decent enough actor back in the day but he&#8217;s totally wrong for that movie.  I like your choices, but I submit Alan Rickman as Langdon.  Assuming he could pull of the American accent I think he&#8217;d be badass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dude Abides</title>
		<link>http://shanelife.com/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude Abides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topfivedesign.com/shane/2004/11/18/tom-hanks-tom-hanks/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>What are you talking about? Are they making an Angels and Demons movie or what? I haven&#039;t heard anything about it. And what does that have to do with Tom Hanks?

-Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about? Are they making an Angels and Demons movie or what? I haven&#8217;t heard anything about it. And what does that have to do with Tom Hanks?</p>
<p>-Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

